Town of Hempstead v. Goldblatt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The question raised is whether an ordinance of the Town of Hempstead regulating the defendants’ business is confiscatory and in violation of the due process clause of both the Federal and State Constitutions.
The defendants seek to revise a judgment of the Appellate Division unanimously affirming a judgment of Special Term upholding the constitutionality of the ordinance and enjoining the defendants from conducting sand mining and excavation on certain property in the Town of Hempstead until a permit has been issued and certain violations of the ordinance have been corrected. They contend that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3Cited by26 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Marcus Associates, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.