City of Portland v. Smith
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARL N. BYERS, Judge.
Petitioner seeks a determination of the effect of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution (hereinafter section lib) on its urban renewal bonded indebtedness. Four interested persons intervened as respondents. Two amicus curiae also participated. This matter is before the court on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The court has considered the oral and written arguments of petitioner, respondents and amicus curiae.
FACTS
On July 24, 1985, the City of Portland, through its urban renewal agency, the Portland Development Commission, adopted an urban renewal plan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State of Oregon v. KuhnhausenOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Comeaux v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Portland v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Shilo Inn Portland/205, LLC v. Multnomah CountyOregon Tax Court · 1999
- Urban Renewal Comm. of Oregon City v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022