Legal Opinion
Keitel v. Heubel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 2002No. A095703PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 Cal.Rptr.2d 216 (2002)
98 Cal.App.4th 678
Mary C. KEITEL, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
George W. HEUBEL et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. A095703.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two.
May 21, 2002.
As Modified June 3, 2002.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 18, 2002.
Review Granted July 17, 2002.
Daniel Ray Bacon, Fresno, Attorney for Appellants.
Brian R. Dinday, Attorney for Respondent.
HAERLE, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Mary Keitel obtained a judgment for fraud and undue influence against her brother George Heubel and George's wife, Peggy. A jury found that the Heubels deprived Keitel of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Parker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeRose v. HeurlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re MusaelianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2002