Legal Opinion

State v. Marrs

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 1, 2003No. 13-01-00566-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the “Motion to Suppress Purported Refusal to Take Breath Test” of appellee, Michael Lavern Marrs. We reverse and remand.

On November 23, 2000, appellee was arrested for the offense of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). 2 He provided a breath sample for testing, however the sample was not sufficient to register a result on the intoxilyzer. Appellee’s inability to provide a measurable breath sample was deemed a refusal to do so by the arresting officer.

Appellee filed a motion to suppress his purported…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. State v. BallardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  2. Darrell Jerome Holt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  3. Darrell Jerome Holt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Darrell Jerome Holt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. George W. Brosam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API