Holt v. State

Memorandum Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Darrell Jerome Holt, appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated.

His three issues involve the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence. He contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove that he had a blood alcohol concentration of at least .08 at the time of his arrest and that it was legally and factually insufficient to prove that he had lost the normal use of his mental or physical faculties at the time of his arrest. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Issue 1 — Legal Sufficiency of Blood Alcohol…