Johnson v. Ford New Holland, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The trial court of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court refused to accept appellant Le Roy Johnson’s unsigned medical report into evidence because it was not timely disclosed, in violation of Workers’ Comp. Ct. R. of Proc. 4 (1996), and was not signed, in violation of Workers’ Comp. Ct. R. of Proc. 10 (1996). The court then denied Johnson’s motion for a continuance. Subsequently, the action was dismissed because Johnson failed to show causation. A review panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court affirmed. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting Johnson’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Berggren v. Grand Island Accessories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Winn v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Sheridan v. Catering Management, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Vacanti v. Master Electronics Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Bower v. Eaton Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Eddy v. Builders Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re Interest of Azia B.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- Dudley v. HuizengaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.