Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Huizenga

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this workers’ compensation proceeding, the claimant’s attorney missed a stipulated deadline for disclosing expert witnesses. He provided the disclosure eight weeks late. The Department of Labor granted the employer’s motion to strike the claimant’s experts, and, since *646the claimant had no case without expert evidence, the Department also granted summary judgment for the employer. Because our workers’ compensation laws and administrative rules are remedial in nature and should be liberally construed to achieve their purposes, we conclude that it was an abuse of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Magbuhat v. KovarikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lagge v. Corsica Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Corcoran v. McCarthySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. BrittonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wellman v. SCHAD EXCAVATION, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API