Legal Opinion

Bowen v. School District No. 9

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Barry Circuit.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff below recovered judgment for the amount of a school district order and the interest thereon; defendant 'having, as the referee found, wrongfully procured the order as a substitute for a certain Goodyear order, wbicb he untruly claimed to have paid and then lost, and having afterwards used it as money in the payment of his taxes. The recovery was on the. common counts in assumpsit.

It is objected that an action in tort should have been brought, and not assumpsit. But as tire defendant made use of the order as money, the law will raise an - implied promise to pay the amount. The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rehmann, Robson & Co. v. McMahanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Compton v. Joseph Lepak, Dds, PcMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Township of Buckeye v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Burns Clinic Medical Center v. VorenkampMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API