Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. United States Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
Assuming but not deciding that the uncertainty and insecurity now added to the petition by amendment was not within the limits of the former decision the rationale of the former decision still controls this case, and the court erred in allowing the amendments over proper and timely objections. We held before that all the rights of the parties under the insurance contract and other agreements were fixed at the time of the collision between the train and the dirt-moving machine and that the plaintiff was not in a position of having to take some action which might jeopardize…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Taylor v. Safeco Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Boggs v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wheelwright Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DowseSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.