Legal Opinion

McMann v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 17115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANSON, Y. CL J.

T. F. McMann is the plaintiff in error herein, and W. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Company is the defendant in error. They occupy here the same relative positions as in the trial court; that is to say, the said T. F. McMann appeals from his failure to obtain a judgment which he sought against the defendant in error. They are referred to as plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff sought .a recovery against the defendant in the sum of $3,600. The essential averments of the pleadings are admitted in the stipulated lacts, the substance of which is necessary to an understanding of the real…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Clark v. SullivanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. RosenbushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Petters & Co. v. School Dist. No. 5Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Sisler v. Sapulpa Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API