Taylor v. King

Eberhakdt, Judge.

This case involves the following factors, viz.: (1) Was the notice given the defendant city sufficient under Code § 69-308, as amended? (2) If so, was the defendant city exercising a ministerial function under these facts? and (3) Is the defendant King, the airport manager, personally liable? These points will be considered in the above order.

Idle plaintiff attached a copy of a letter to his petition which he contends was sufficient notice to the defendant city. Tbz letter was sent to the Mayor of Columbus and set forth the details of the occurrence including the alleged…