Legal Opinion

Mollencop v. City of Salem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1932PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The testimony discloses that during the time mentioned herein defendant was the owner of the airport in question; that on the 6th day of August, 1929, an agreement in writing was executed by defendant and one Lee Eyerly, by the terms of which it was agreed that for a term of two years said Eyerly would superintend the operation and management of said airport, and, among other things, collect all fees and rentals for the city, make a report to the city on the first of each and every month, and at that time account and pay over to the city all revenues due the said city; it being therein…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Mackay v. Commission of PostOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Poole v. TilfordOregon Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API