Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Merck & Co. (In re Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Prods. Liab. Litig.)

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2019No. MDL No. 2848; CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-20057; CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-20059PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBartle, District Judge

Plaintiffs Norma Stanton and Sandra Morris, in separate actions, have sued defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (both defendants hereinafter "Merck") and McKesson Corp. for personal injuries arising from their inoculation with Merck's drug Zostavax for the prevention of shingles. Both actions, in which plaintiffs are represented by the same attorney, were originally filed in the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County, Florida and timely removed based on diversity of citizenship to the United States District Court for the Middle District of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benham v. City of CharlotteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API