Legal Opinion

Wild v. Krenke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1949No. 16773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Since the equitable relief sought in the original petition was rescission and cancellation of the purchase contract and partnership agreement, the amendment, alleging rescission and cancellation of these contracts by mutual agreement, would eliminate all equity; and thus deprive the Supreme Court of jurisdiction of the writ of error if the amendment had been allowed without objection. But the defendant’s demurrer assails the amendment, and the judgment overruling that demurrer is brought under, review by this bill of exceptions. A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Cox v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Shoup v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Howard v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. George M. Couch, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Georgia Industrial Realty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API