Legal Opinion

Corgatelli v. Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1975No. 11513PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court reversing a judgment of the magistrate’s division on a claim under an insurance contract and remanding the matter for further proceedings in the magistrate court. We in turn reverse the decision of the district court and add to the body of Idaho law the so-called “doctrine of reasonable expectations” in litigation involving interpretation of insurance contracts.

Plaintiff-appellant Randolph Corgatelli was a part-time rodeo performer and a member of an association made up of such performers. That association sanctioned the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Abbie Uriguen Oldsmobile Buick, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Medical-Dental Service, Inc. v. BorooIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API