Legal Opinion

Myers v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1909No. 21,312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Wabash Circuit Court; A. H. Plummer, Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against Clarence Myers. Prom a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant was fined, under the Nicholson law, for permitting a person other than a member of his family to enter his saloon on the Pourth of July.

The only error assigned is the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment.

The Attorney-General calls attention tó appellant’s noncompliance with the fifth clause of rule twenty-two of this court, and insists upon the rule’s enforcement. ' The motion in arrest calls in question the legal sufficiency of the charge to state a public offense.

Neither the affidavit upon which the judgment is founded *674nor the motion in arrest is set ont in appellant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. American Food Co. v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Barricklow v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rigrish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Epstein v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rowan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Holliday v. AnheierIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wilt v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API