Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1903No. 19,977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Clay Circuit CourtP. O. Colliver, Judge. Action by John T. Stewart against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

— The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant for a personal injury sustained by him at a street crossing in the city of Indianapolis hy reason of the alleged negligence of the appellant.

The railroad company appeals, and assigns for error the overruling of its motion for a new trial. The reasons for the motion discussed by counsel for appellant are:(1) That the verdict is not sustained hy sufficient evidence;(2) that the court erred in giving instructions numbered six, seven, eight, and nine; and (3) that the answers of the jury to certain questions of fact were not sustained by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. City of Bedford v. NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bonebrake v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. City of Bluffton v. McAfeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railway Co. v. BerndtIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. VandenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Albaugh Bros., Dover & Co. v. LynasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API