Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Hancock

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1916No. 9,220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; William C. Purdum, Judge. Charles E. Hancock, administrator of the estate of William Hancock, deceased, filed a current report and Ollie Hancock filed exceptions thereto. From an approval of the report as filed, the exceptor .appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

Appellee, as administrator of the estate of William Hancock, deceased, filed an amended current report, to certain items of which appellant filed exceptions as follows: By item No.. 1 of amounts chargeable, appellee charges himself with $23,404. Appellant, as the widow of decedent, William Hancock, by her exception to this item, claims that the above amount included two certificates of deposit in her name, amounting to $8,000, which belonged to her. By credits Nos. 1 and 7 of said report, appelíee claims to have paid $82 and $66, respectively, for administrator’s bonds. Appellant’s exceptions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Beach v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Doty v. . WillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Folsom v. ButtolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Wells v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hutchens, Admr. v. HutchensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Wells v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hancock v. HancockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API