Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

Much of the argument and many of the authorities cited by plaintiffs appertain to sales made by an administrator, executor or other trustee to himself. Such a sale is absolutely void in this state. If that was the problem presented it would have been easily solved: Or. L., § 1276; Adams v. Kennard, 122 Or. 84 (253 Pac. 1048); Gilbert v. Branchflower, 114 Or. 508, 516 (231 Pac. 982); Acton v. Lamberson, 102 Or. 472, 488 (202 Pac. 421, 732). *46Executors are trustees of the beneficiaries of the will they are executing: 11 R. C. L. 23, § 6; 23 C. J. 1170, § 387; Woerner, Administration (2 ed.), §§…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Roach's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Goodwin v. GoodwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Venator v. QuierOregon Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API