Legal Opinion
Sapen v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 2007No. 20A03-0609-CR-424PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-Defendant Charles E. Sapen (“Sapen”) appeals his convictions for Resisting Law Enforcement, as a Class D felony, 1 and Operating While Intoxicated, as a Class A misdemeanor. 2 We reverse the convictions and remand for retrial on the Operating While Intoxicated count. 3
Issues
Sapen raises six issues for review. We address the issue that we find dispositive: whether the trial court erroneously admitted evidence obtained in violation of Sa-pen’s Fourth Amendment rights.
Because we reverse the convictions, it is necessary to address an additional issue:…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Shoultz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Casselman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James Lee Paul v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Robin Harper v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shakur Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Earl B. Martin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.