State v. Carelock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
We overrule defendant’s first assignment of error based on denial of his motion to dismiss the charge of first degree burglary because no “breaking” had been shown. Opening a closed but unlocked door is a sufficient breaking. State v. Wilson, 289 N.C. 531, 223 S.E. 2d 311 (1976); State v. Craddock, 272 N.C. 160, 158 S.E. 2d 25 (1967); State v. Tippett, 270 N.C. 588, 155 S.E. 2d 269 (1967). Mrs. Lovelace testified that all outside doors were closed. In his incriminating statement offered in evidence by the State, defendant said the back door was open. The conflict in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Jones v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979