Snyder v. Director, Employment Security Department
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Bird, Judge.
The appellant, Danny K. Snyder, was discharged from his employment with Eaton Aeroquip, Inc., and filed a claim for unemployment benefits. The Board of Review denied benefits upon finding that Snyder was discharged for misconduct in connection with the work, and Snyder appeals. He contends that the Board erred in finding that he was discharged for misconduct in connection with the work. We find no error and we affirm.
We do not conduct a de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. Brooks v. Director, 62 Ark. App. 85, 966 S.W.2d 941 (1998). In appeals of unemployment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nibco, Inc. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Baldor Electric Co. v. Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Peters v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Bennett v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Brooks v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. Director of the Arkansas Employment Security Department & Beverly HealthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Coker v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Moody v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- Law Offices of Cook v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Burch v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.