Urman v. South Boston Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
The plaintiffs, Pete Urman and Victoria Ur-man, filed a complaint in the Superior Court alleging that, when they purchased a foreclosed condominium unit from the defendant, South Boston Savings Bank (bank), it failed to disclose to them that a toxic waste contamination problem had existed on a nearby property. The plaintiffs claimed that the bank’s conduct constituted fraud and deceit, a violation of G. L. c. 93A, and the negligent infliction of emotional distress, which entitled them to the equitable remedies of rescission and restitution and the legal remedy of damages. A judge in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Majca v. BeekilIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Frappier v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Doe v. Emerson CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.