Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Villagran

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1982No. J80-0671, CA A20520Published

1DissentRichardson, J.

The majority strikes down the warrant because the affidavit did not establish probable cause to believe the underground house on Cal Henry Road would contain evidence of the crime of manufacturing a controlled substance. I disagree and therefore dissent.

In reviewing the decision of a magistrate to issue a search warrant, we are guided by well established principles. First, there is a general preference in the law for warranted rather than warrantless searches. As the United States Supreme Court said:

“* * * Although in a particular case it may not be easy to determine when an affidavit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API