Legal Opinion
Atmel Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 18, 2006No. C 04-04082 SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: CGL AND UMBRELLA POLICIES
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On March 17, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on defendant St. Paul’s motion for partial summary judgment on Atmel’s claim for coverage under the CGL and umbrella policies. 1 After careful consideration of the parties’ papers and the arguments of counsel, the Court GRANTS St. Paul’s motion.
LEGAL STANDARD
Summary adjudication is proper when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Advanced Network, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Centillium Communications, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Target Corporation v. ACE American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021