Legal Opinion

Xum Speegle, Inc. v. Fields

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1963No. Civ. 20315PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

This is an appeal by defendants Mark S. Fields and Growers Insurance Agency from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Xum Speegle, Inc., in an action for unfair competition and breach of fiduciary duty.

In this suit, defendant Fields was charged with wrongfully breaching his fiduciary duty as a director and officer of plaintiff corporation by establishing defendant Growers Insurance Agency, a corporation, and by entering into direct competition, in the general insurance business, with plaintiff; and further, that he had by means of confidential information obtained during his long association with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Walpole v. Prefab Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. StranskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Weber, Lipshie & Co. v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Hutcherson v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API