Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Regan DARRELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1987No. 86-2113PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant, James Regan Darrell, appeals his conviction on two counts of using a false social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(g)(2), six counts of making false statements for the purpose of influencing banks insured by the Federal Deposit…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John J. PappertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States of America, and v. David Morales, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.