Legal Opinion
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. Cassel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1983No. 80-1425, and 80-1433 to 80-1436PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants appeal from criminal convictions obtained under the federal conspiracy and racketeering laws.
The indictment alleged that the appellants had conspired to use interstate travel and facilities in order to further an Oklahoma bookmaking operation which was illegal under Oklahoma’s commercial gambling laws. See Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 21 §§ 981- 988 (West Supp.1981). The indictment charged that the conspiracy violated the provisions of title 18, section 371 of the United States Code, which imposes criminal sanctions where “two or more persons conspire ... to commit…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Hinman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.