Legal Opinion

Shelp v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1940No. 29637Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as intervener, filed his petition in intervention in the district court in an action wherein defendant in error, as plaintiff, hereinafter so designated, had attached certain property which consisted of hay grown on the leased premises while said premises were in the possession of T. C. Mat-lock, defendant, as tenant. The purpose of the action as filed by the plaintiff was to enforce a landlord’s lien against her tenant. A judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Intervener filed a motion for new trial and a new trial was granted, whereupon the cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston Real Estate Investment Co. v. HechlerUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Mangum v. StadelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Shefts Supply, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Crump v. SadlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Wilmering v. HinkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API