Legal Opinion

Wilmering v. Hinkle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1916No. 7297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, (’anadian County. Action by W. W. Hinkle against William Kirne, defendant, and Henry Wihnering in-lerpleader. Judgment for plaintiff, and in-terpleader brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAY, C.

AY. Alr. Hinkle sued AVilliam Ivime in the county court for a balance due and unpaid for rent for the year '1914, and at the same time and in the same action sued out a writ of attachment to enforce his lien against the crops grown on the farm during said year.

It appears that summons was duly served and the' writ of attachment duly executed, save that the officer left the crop consisting of oats in a bin, and baled oat straw and some corn on the premises and in the possession of the defendant Kime.

Plaintiff in error. Henry AA’ilmering filed an interplea claiming said property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scully v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker Cotton Oil Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Markley v. OttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Shelp v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API