Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Wenzel v. May
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1933No. 29,852PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Quo warra4ito brought in this court by the attorney general on relation of plaintiffs challenging the right and title of each respondent to the office of trustee on the board of.trustees of the sanitary district, established under L. 1933, c. 341. Upon the pleadings and certain testimony taken and reported by a referee, the case has been argued and submitted.
The testimony taken relates to whether the order confirming the creation of the sanitary district was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county on August 22, the same day that it was filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Ennis v. . SchroederNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- American Electric Co. v. City of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Cate v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Worcester v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Green's Bar Incorporated v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Chapman v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Tamte v. EddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- A. C. E. Equipment Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.