Legal Opinion
Union Indemnity Co. v. Lang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1934No. 7150PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
The suit involved in the present appeal was brought by the appellees to recover from the appellant, as surety, damages sustained by the former as a result of the alleged breach of the obligations of a bond guaranteeing the faithful performance of a subcontract for the welding of a pipe line between Kettleman Hills and Panoche Hills, Cal.
On March 9, 1929, the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, as “owner,” entered into a contract with the appellees, as “general contractor,” for the construction of a high-pressure gas pipe line approximately 149 miles in length, from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Verdugo Highlands, Inc. v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Seaboard Finance Co. v. Mutual Bankers Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969