Legal Opinion

Hamme v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-0684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, David B. Hamme, initiated this action on June 9, 1980, claiming Defendant Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Company was liable for injuries sustained by plaintiff on September 8, 1978, when a steel power press broke and severed three of plaintiff’s fingers. On July 31, 1980, the defendant filed a third-party complaint to join Hamme’s employer, Cole Business Furniture, as an additional defendant. Defendant specifically limited the purpose of the joinder, claiming it was “solely for the purpose of enabling the jury and the court to determine comparative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bike v. American Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Leonard v. Harris Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kern v. Nissan Industrial Equipment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hamme v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Guffey v. LoganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API