Kern v. Nissan Industrial Equipment Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, Chief Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to preclude Defendant from introducing evidence that plaintiff Paul Kern’s co-worker was negligent. Defendants have submitted a response, and the motion is now ripe for consideration.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Paul J. Kern alleged in his complaint that on July 28, 1989, he was injured at his work place when a fellow employee — Mr. Charles Kessler — backed up a Nissan forklift over his feet. Complaint at 1111. He allegedly backed over Mr. Kern’s legs a second time in an attempt to move the forklift. Defendant’s brief at 3.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Farra v. Stanley-Bostitch, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Parks v. AlliedsignalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Carcaise v. Cemex, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Ballarini v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.