Legal Opinion

Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1961No. 524-59PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

This action, resulting from the alleged infringement of certain claims contained in two separate patents of which the plaintiff is assignee, was instituted on December 10, 1959, and the motion is to dismiss that portion of the claim which is based on United States Letters Patent Reissue No. 20,251 which expired on June 18,1952. It is the position of the defendant that any infringement of this patent which might have occurred took place no later than the date of its expiration. That date is more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint and hence, the defendant says,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Hebern v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Ah Sam v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Custer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Unitrac, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API