Legal Opinion
Ah Sam v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 19, 1982No. 352-79CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This civilian pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. There being no factual dispute, the court is asked to determine whether prevailing rate wage employees who were promoted to General Schedule supervisory positions before June 26, 1974, are entitled to a further increase in wages under 5 U.S.C. §§ 5333 and/or 5334 and their implementing regulations. To the extent that this question has not been reached by the recent Supreme Court decision of United States v. Clark, 454 U.S. 555 (1982), we hold that these federal employees are not entitled to a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Donald D. Huston v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Blankenship v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Marine American State Bank of Bloomington v. LincolnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.