Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Islip Resource Recovery Agency
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 12, 1989No. CV 88-2733PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEXLER, District Judge.
The present action arises out of a contractual dispute between Pennsylvania Energy Resources Company (“PERC”), Pennsylvania Engineering Corporation (“PEC”) and the Islip Resource Recovery Agency (the “Agency”). Plaintiffs asserted four causes of action against defendants. In response defendants filed nine counterclaims against plaintiffs and Victor Posner, a counterclaim defendant.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 defendants moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ entire case and on their first three counterclaims. By order dated April 12, 1989, 710 F.Supp. 456, the Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- International Chemical Workers Union, Local No. 566 v. Mobay Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Islip Resource Recovery AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Encoder Communications, Inc. v. Telegen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northeast Office & Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Smith Valve Corp. (In Re Northeast Office & Commercial Properties, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Chilcott Entertainment L.L.C. v. John G. Kinnard Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re the Arbitration between Disston Co. & AktiebolagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- BurgherGray LLP v. Christopher KlugDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Guido Malato v. DigitalOcean LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.