Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. State
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided May 17, 1967No. Civ. No. 1076LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
Armour and Company seeks declaratory and injunctive relief as to Legislative Bill 169 enacted by the Seventy-fifth Session of the Nebraska Legislature (Session Laws 1965, p. 73) against the officials and the agency of the State charged with its enforcement.1 Federal unconstitutionality of the statute is claimed on its labeling requirements for the sale within Nebraska of imported meat and products containing such meat.
The case has been submitted to us on an agreed statement of facts. This stipulation shows that Armour is an importer of meat from other countries, brought into…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alexander v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ness Produce Co. v. ShortDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- Tupman Thurlow Company v. MossDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
- Short v. Ness Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- American Meat Institute v. BallDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
- American Meat Institute v. BallDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2002
- Opinion No. (1979), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1979
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2002