Legal Opinion

Carothers v. McKinley Mining & Smelting Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided July 7, 1902No. 725PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(orally). This suit was brought in the state court. Thereafter, upon the application of nonresident defendants, it was removed to this court. Plaintiff moves to remand the cause to the state court on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause. The legal phase of the questions raised by the motion calls for a brief statement of the nature of the suit as gleaned from the complaint and matters set forth in the petition for removal.

The suit is in the nature of a bill to quiet title to the “Pair Play,” .formerly called the “Saxton,” mining claim, situate in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Stanbrough v. CookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1889
  3. Bates v. CarpentierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
  4. Bacon v. FeltU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
  2. Stuart v. Colorado Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Brown Alaska Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  4. Bonner v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1953
  5. McMullen v. Halleck Cattle Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API