Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Felt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa

Decided May 25, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Bill to Quiet Title. Motion to remand.

1Opinion of the CourtShtras, J.

The complainants as heirs at law of M. W. Bacon, deceased, brought this suit in the district court of Woodbury county, Iowa, for the purpose of quieting their title to certain realty situated in Woodbury county. In the amended bill f}led the complainants averred that in August, 1856, Moses W. Bacon died intestate seised in fee of the realty in question, leaving the complainants his heirs at law, whereby they became seised in fee of two-thirds of said realty; that the defendants make some claim adverse to the title and estate of complainants ami are now in possession of said realty; that said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Pirie v. TvedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Texas Transportation Co. v. SeeligsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bates v. CarpentierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
  2. Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Marshall v. Navco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
  4. Carothers v. McKinley Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1902
  5. Bonner v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API