Legal Opinion

People v. Ball

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Sessions, Sonoma County.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Sonoma County. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that it did not sufficiently describe the property charged to have been stolen. The demurrer was overruled, and he thereupon plead not guilty, was tried, and convicted. The property is described as “three thousand dollars, lawful money of the United States.” *102This description is not sufficient. In an indictment for larceny, money should be described as so many pieces of the current gold or silver coin of the country, of a particular denomination, according to the facts. “ The species of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. State v. SegermondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. In re WatermanNevada Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. TilneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API