Legal Opinion

Hill v. Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1935No. 6 Div. 787PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff recovered of one A. E. Cumby a judgment for damages arising out of a collision with a truck, owned by Wilson & Co., and operated at the time by said Cumby, an employee of said Wilson & Co. There was in force at the time a liability insurance policy issued by defendant to Wilson & Co., and plaintiff sues thereon; his right to so prosecute the suit resting upon section E of the 'policy.

It appears from the pleadings (details omitted) that, though Cumby at the time of the collision was in the permissive use of the truck belonging to Wilson & Co., yet he was making use…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC. v. HareCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. General Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Rodgers v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Ellis v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API