Legal Opinion
Benckini v. Hawk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 14, 2009No. Civil Action 07-3580PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PRATTER, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Gene C. Benckini, a frequent litigant in this Court, again has sued a number of law enforcement personnel. Considering the Complaint most indulgently in order to give him all benefits of the doubt, Mr. Benckini alleges that Upper Saucon Police Department officers wrongfully denied him access to the land he leased for his nursery business, shoved him on one occasion, and issued to him a traffic citation for a tail light that was functioning properly.
Cross motions for summary judgment on behalf of Mr. Benckini and Upper Saucon Police Officers…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Mitchell v. LuckenbillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Smith v. VilsackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Harp v. RahmeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Global Tower, LLC v. Hamilton TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.