Legal Opinion

Shelton v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson Coun: ty. — A. G. Rutherford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Mrs. Shelton brought this suit to recover damages, alleging that, while she was a passenger oh defendant’s railway between Memphis, Tenn., and Little Rock, Ark., the defendant failed to provide separate dining cars or a partitioned dining car as required, it was claimed, by an Arkánsas statute, which provides *380for the separate accommodation of the white and negro races. It was further alleged that the plaintiff as passenger was brought into involuntary association with members of the colored race, by reason of the negligence of the railway company.

It appears that plaintiff, her husband and two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chiles v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Maxey v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railroad v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Chiles v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warley v. Board of Park CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Sweeney v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Illinois Cent. R. v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API