Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 20, 1967No. 666PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling defendant’s plea of former jeopardy. This assignment is without merit. We have repeatedly held:
“When, in either a post-conviction hearing or a habeas corpus proceeding, at the prisoner's request, the court vacates a judgment against him and directs a new trial, the prisoner waives his constitutional protection against double jeopardy, and he may be tried anew on the same indictment for the same offense. In such case, a plea of former jeopardy will avail him nothing. State v. Hollars, 266 N.C. 45, 145 S.E. 2d 309;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. HollarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HaasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re Appeal No. 245, September Term, 1975 From the Circuit Court for Kent CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.