In Re Coppock
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill
To be enforceable by contempt, a judgment must clearly order or command a party to perform the obligations imposed and the terms for compliance must be clear and unequivocal. Because the judgment challenged in this proceeding lacks the necessary clarity, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and set aside the order of contempt as void.
Raymond Coppock and Gayle Magness, formerly Gayle Coppock, divorced in October 2003. The trial court’s final decree of divorce incorporated a mediated settlement agreement between the parties which, among other things, permanently enjoined them from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Bradley v. State Ex Rel. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Ex Parte WerbludTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Ex Parte GorenaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Webb v. Glenbrook Owners Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- In re Rivas-LunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re HesseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- In re HightowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.