Legal Opinion

Marquardt Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 8, 2010No. 09-642 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge.

Before the court are plaintiffs Complaint (Compl.) and attached exhibits (Plaintiffs Exhibits or PX), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1; Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint, Dkt. No. 6; Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count II, Count III, and Portions of Count IV of Plaintiffs Complaint (Motion to Dismiss or Def.’s Motion), Dkt. No. 11; The Marquardt Company’s Opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Count II, Count III and Portions of Count TV (Pl.’s Response), Dkt. No. 14; and Defendant’s Reply to the Marquardt Company’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marquardt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API