Legal Opinion
Black Property Owners Assn. v. City of Berkeley
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1994No. A058358PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
council (the City) involves the City’s compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 65583 and related sections in updating the housing element of its general plan; it also involves the application of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) to that update.
The trial court granted a petition for writ of mandate directing the City to: (1) rescind its adoption of the update and a negative declaration; (2) prepare a new initial study and an environmental impact report (EIR) analyzing the environmental effects of the City’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- WOODWARD PARK HOMEOWNERS v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Stanislaus Natural Heritage Project v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of SonoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.