Christian v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Linn,
Plaintiffs complain that their foreign attachment was quashed. It appears by the statement of claim that the proceeding is founded on a judgment obtained in a court of West Virginia in an action of covenant. The certified record of the West Virginia proceeding recites that defendant was served personally, appeared and participated in the trial, and that the court, on September 5, 1930, found for the plaintiff in the sum of $8,500, saying: “It is therefore adjudged and ordered by the court that the plaintiff James A. Paisley do recover of and from the defendant S. A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Frankel v. Donehoo (Nesbitt)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Keystone State Corp. v. Union Indemnity Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941