Commonwealth v. Cousins, M., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.
OPINION
JUSTICE TODD
*35 In this appeal by allowance, we consider whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court's application of the enhanced sentencing provision in Section 780-113(b) of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act ("Act"), 35 P.S. §§ 780-101 et seq. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the Superior Court's decision was correct, and, thus, we affirm its order.
As the instant matter concerns the interpretation of the Act, in particular Section 780-113(b), it is helpful first to set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ZortmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RamosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. PitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Com. v. Kolesar, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. of PA v. E.P. StilpCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Bell, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Pacheco, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Pedro, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.